Internship Course Helps Liberal Arts Majors Navigate Career Paths

Audio

By Brian Cortes

Hum 470, a five-credit asynchronous class, allows students to gain experience from private or public workplaces using skills they have gained from studying the liberal arts. This means students can participate in internships or jobs while being supervised in the course, and have this experience count towards their academic progress.

One of those students is Leonard Barret, a Lehman student who interned as a New York City Summer Youth Employment Program (SYEP) Program Aide. A big part of his experience was embracing real-world challenges, such as dealing with time management. “I think balancing school and work is always a difficult kind of thing,” said Barrett, who received career-focused training in his internship. “That was a little overwhelming, but luckily with this course in particular, it was able to be an extension of my work…because I felt like I was getting better at my job with the videos that I've been watching and the articles that I was reading for this class.”

“It accepts students where they are, job [or] internship-wise, and then helps all of them to develop the professional skills and understandings they need to get to the next step in their college-to-career journey.” -- Paula Loscocco, Lehman College English professor

Paula Loscocco, an English professor who teaches this course, said, “It accepts students where they are, job [or] internship-wise, and then helps all of them to develop the professional skills and understandings they need to get to the next step in their college-to-career journey.” This means that if a student is currently engaged in an internship or job that fulfills the requirement for the course, they can continue to work at it and receive credit for it, making scheduling an easier process for them.

This structure worked well for Ashley Soto, who was able to count her job as venue coordinator as her internship this semester. Reflecting on how she coped with this kind of school-work relationship, she said it is giving her valuable insights. “I'm learning a lot, which is why I'm pretty excited for the most part,” she said. “It feels good taking this internship with my job …because I find myself each week reflecting on something new I learned.”

Other students reported experiencing various forms of personal and professional growth, especially learning and progressing in the fields towards which they aspire. Towards the end of the semester, students must apply for a "next-step" position, submitting a resume, LinkedIn profile and cover letter to ensure they can leverage the experience into bigger career opportunities.

Hum 470 also allows students to glimpse their possible futures, helping them decide if the industry they wanted to participate in is the right fit for them—or not. Modupeore

Raji, an English major that wanted to experiment with the world of theater, was able to take that chance in the course.

“Before I took this internship, I was an English major with ideas of going to publishing, maybe becoming an editor, but learning more about the theater industry from Lehman Stages helped me get to know that it is feasible for me to have a career in theater,” Raji said. As students face their next steps post-university, Hum 470 provides a window onto possible paths ahead of them.

Change in taste: Lehman’s culinary experience post-pandemic

Audio

By Brian Cortes

For many students at Lehman, grabbing a bite to eat between classes or catching up with friends over lunch is an essential part of the college experience. Whether it’s breakfast in the morning, lunch in the afternoon, or even a simple snack to get through the day, eating something while on campus has become essential to students. Considering this, it is no surprise that students have paid close attention to Lehman's dining services. In the process of keeping up with the dining services, many questions from students have arisen over time. As Lehman students returned in the fall of 2021 during the transition period of reopening post-pandemic, they left the cafeteria services behind as it remained closed until the fall of 2022. Once it did, students quickly noticed their dining experience differed from the one they remembered. With different food options and items, they remember having a different presentation. Following this, students began raising questions about the changes.  

David Charcape, Assistant Director of Campus Life, reflected on the pre-pandemic dining scene, explaining, "Prior to the pandemic, the college used to have a vendor called Metropolitan. Not only did they run the main cafeteria in the basement of the Music Building, but they also offered catering services for campus events. Most of the clubs and offices used their services often, and the prices were very competitive.” 

Metropolitan Food Service Inc. was the food service provider that supplied the campus with most of its food options, and the experience most students were familiar with before the pandemic. Many students reflect on their experience when Metropolitan was around with comments like “I could always count on a slice of pizza to get me through the day” and “the burger and fries combo always hit the spot and left me and my friends satisfied.” Also, similar sentiments were shared about how the cafeteria services back then created a comfortable environment for them to eat or simply hang out before, in between, and after classes. 

Like many things in our time, Metropolitan Food Services Inc. was not able to stay open for business as Lehman and other colleges shut down campus activities. This served as a primary source of income for Metropolitan, and the absence made it hard for them to stay in business. This is true for most of the food providers of colleges in NYC. Despite this, Lehman needed to continue providing dining services as part of getting the services on campus back up and running. This led to a new supplier taking the reins of dining services at Lehman in the form of JG Restaurant Ventures LLC (DBA World Cup). JG has been in charge of the current food services at Lehman since the reopening of its cafeteria services. The change was apparent when students observed that their usual food items, like the pizza, looked and tasted different.  

To gauge if the overall experience provided by JG is better, worse, or the same as Metropolitan is harder to evaluate since comparing taste, portions, health benefits, and overall experience are different areas that could vary depending on who you ask. However, a comparison between both services presents itself in the form of the annual budgets of the Lehman Auxiliary Enterprise Corporation, which demonstrates the revenues that the cafeterias bring to Lehman annually.

According to the files in the fiscal year of 2019-2020, when Metropolitan was still operating, the cafeteria generated around  $126,837 compared to our current fiscal year 2024-2025, in which JG is running reports of around $60,000. At first glance, based on the numbers, it might appear that Metropolitan’s final year running provided more satisfaction by a long shot compared to JG, which hasn’t been able to gross half of Metropolitan's earnings. But it's important to remember that Lehman is still recuperating itself post-COVID and that JG is continuously reassessing and refining its services to better provide to students. Since Metropolitan had a longer time for trial and error, it had time to figure out what the best accommodations were when servicing Lehman.

 Further inspection of the Auxiliary Enterprise Corporation files also reveals that in the fiscal year of 2022-2023, the cafeteria generated $20,000, and in the fiscal year of 2023-2024, the cafeteria generated $45,000. Considering that this year generated around $60,000, it is evident there's an upward trajectory in performance from JG since their income has increased yearly. This trend indicates that students are slowly trusting JG more and more for their dining services. Something important to note is that JG has to compete with other food services that students have adopted when all the cafeteria services at Lehman were closed. This includes other local dining locations like cafes, food carts, and restaurants. Something that Metropolitan didn’t have to deal with as much. Once Lehman began providing dining services, students weren’t so quick to change back from the new food options they had made part of a routine.

 It’s natural for a business not to do so well at the start and to progress with further time to succeed continuously. Just because JG hasn’t immediately shown the same profit level as the Metropolitan once did, it doesn’t mean that it won’t ever equal or surpass it at some point.

Dealing with AI at Lehman: AI’s impact on the educational system

Audio

By Brian Cortes

On November 30th, 2022, ChatGPT was released to the public, marking a significant milestone in the use of artificial intelligence. Since then, its rapid integration into both educational and professional environments has raised important questions about the role of AI in the future of learning. At Lehman College, students and professors alike have experienced firsthand the effects of AI on their daily routines, shaping differing opinions on how it should be used and what its implications could be for students' career paths. 

One such student is Ertis Pashako, a Lehman undergraduate majoring in Film and TV Studies with a concentration in TV. As both a student and freelance content creator, Ertis has witnessed how AI tools have significantly transformed his academic experience as well as his creative endeavors. Reflecting on this change, he observes, “A lot of apps started coming out for photographers where you can fix photos. Just swipe to go to Photoshop and zoom in. You don't fix it. Now you just have a regular app that you download, and you just transfer your photo over, and basically swipe it, and it fixes everything for you. And then stuff like ChatGPT came out, so everybody in school started using it to write their papers.” 

Above, this shift in workflow, from hands-on creative efforts to AI-driven automation, has led Ertis to a broader reflection on the pros and cons of AI in education. On one hand, AI provides powerful tools that can streamline the creative process, helping content creators and editors enhance their work more efficiently. On the other hand, the ease of access to such tools can inadvertently encourage students to cut corners, altering their mindset toward the effort they put into their work. Ertis notes, "I thought of many things. First, this is gonna help editors—once programs or apps get good at it—where you can just upload all your footage, and it does the editing for you, kind of mimicking your style of editing. So, this is gonna be great for content creators. Then there's the negative side, where people use it to cheat, and it makes people lazy. They’re not doing their own work, their own research. They're just typing stuff and getting automated answers, then copying and pasting." 

In the sky, as AI continues to weave itself into both the academic and personal lives of students, questions arise about the role educational institutions should play in this evolving landscape. Ertis advocates for colleges to incorporate AI into the curriculum—not as a substitute for personal effort, but as a tool to complement students’ learning. He emphasizes that while AI is relatively new, its influence will only grow, and schools need to stay ahead by educating students on how to use AI responsibly. “Maybe incorporate a little AI into what we're learning, teach us more about it. It's something very new that even schools and professors haven't picked up. Two years ago, there were few things like ChatGPT. So it had a bad reputation coming in. People were cheating and basically writing their papers, and professors, they didn't know at the time,” Ertis comments. He envisions a future where students learn how to use AI as an aid to their projects, rather than letting AI take control of their creative processes. 

However, students are not the only ones grappling with the ethical and practical implications of AI. Professors, too, are reflecting on how AI is impacting the educational system. Professor Margot Mifflin, who teaches courses on beauty pageants, national identity, and the publishing industry at Lehman, has seen AI affect student writing in real time. She recalls noticing the use of AI-generated work as early as the fall of 2022, pointing out how it often manifested in disjointed and erratic sentence structures that were noticeably different from typical student writing. “I saw it in the fall of last year, and it's sort of easy to detect, or it was then, because it scrambles sentences, and so, you know, a student might be writing and, suddenly there's a lesson on another topic, there's no flow in a way that I've never seen in student writing,” she explains.

For Mifflin, the issue extends beyond just catching AI-generated work; it’s about ensuring that students are developing their own writing skills. She highlights the importance of writing as a fundamental form of self-expression that is essential in both personal and professional contexts. “I think it's going to be harder for students who think they can rely on it. There's just so many parts of life where you have to be able to write, even if you're not an English major. Learning to write is learning to express yourself, and learning to express yourself is such an important part of our world in terms of connecting with other people and understanding them, and helping them understand us. So doing that yourself is pretty crucial for any person,” she adds. 

This concern is not just theoretical. Mifflin shares a personal anecdote in which her book, The Blue Tattoo, was used without her permission to train AI, raising ethical questions about the use of copyrighted work in AI training. "It was kind of jarring to discover that the text was used to feed the AI, and all the tropes and expressions and sentence structures were replicated so it could be reused and regurgitated when people want to compose something," she recounts. This raises broader concerns about the ethical use of AI, especially as more creative and academic content is fed into these systems, often without the original creators’ consent. 

In light of these developments, Mifflin advises students to resist the temptation to rely on AI for their academic work, urging them to reach out to professors for support if they feel uncertain about their skills. “I would say, try to resist the urge to use it. Because it's important for you to develop writing skills of your own. And if you feel the urge to use it because of pressure, like work pressure or insecurity about your writing skills, talk to your professor before you resort to using it. Find out how you can feel better about your own writing without using a crutch,” she advises. 

Ultimately, the debate surrounding AI in education is far from settled. As AI software becomes more advanced and harder to detect, schools will need to adapt continuously, finding ways to address the changing dynamics between students and AI. The discussion extends beyond just academic settings, as the same students who experiment with AI in school will likely encounter it in various professional fields, from literature and entertainment to STEM disciplines. 

Above all, the challenge for both students and educators will be to strike a balance between using AI as a helpful tool and maintaining the integrity of individual skills and creativity. As technology continues to evolve, the conversation surrounding AI will also need to expand, taking into account the long-term implications of its use. In the end, the key lies in learning how to use AI effectively—without letting it undermine the essential human effort and innovation that education is meant to foster. 

Lehman vs Baruch, CUNY’s Powerhouse Rivals

Audio

By Brian Cortes

	The thrill of beating your opponent while representing your team is a challenge that excites both players and fans alike. And this is especially true for the biggest rivalry in CUNY Athletics, Lehman vs. Baruch. These two sides are not only constantly battling it out, but they are also consistently at the top of their division. They compete across multiple athletic fields, often competing for equipment, making every game’s result that much more impactful. This rivalry has kept both sides on their toes, as neither side has fallen out of their high level of performance. It seems that they don’t want to miss each other, and if the past is any indication of the present, this rivalry will see both teams become bigger giants in their division.

I was able to speak with Ryan McCarthy, the Director of Athletics and Apex facilities, who oversees various aspects including the facilities, teams, coaches, and everything in between. When asked about his views on  the rivalry between Lehman and Baruch, he commented “Three weeks ago today they beat us in the CUNY AC (Athletic Conference) Men’s Basketball Championship by two points, which is especially heartbreaking because it’s the third straight year in which they’ve beaten us.” Despite Baruch having more wins in the rivalry, both schools demand to see each other constantly at the finals. However, there is a more competitive aspect to the bigger picture.  As McCarthy later comments, “Two years ago we beat them in the CUNYAC Men's Soccer Championship. Then last year Baruch was the first-place Baseball team in CUNY AC, but we beat them in the Cunyac baseball playoffs to go to the baseball championship.” The competitiveness of both schools spreads across multiple CUNY athletic conference sports, contributing to the growing rivalry between both sides. 

Throughout this long competition, both schools will find themselves changing their position in the rankings, exchanging the lead. It is normal for any team to go through. At times, Lehman teams may find themselves experiencing a low point. Ryan explains the difficulty of guiding the team out of that position. He says “That [doing this] could come in a lot of ways you know, I think it’s about showing support. Whether that's at an individual basis to students, on a team basis, whether it’s for coaches, whether it’s from coaches whether it’s from my administrators and I.'' It's clear that all parts of the Apex show up and tend to all aspects of their teams, making sure they can be present and put in all their effort to participate in this rivalry. I later asked Ryan what he thought about the rivalry, and he responded “It’s been a friendly and competitive rivalry at the same time,” and “There's no bad blood, it's more out on the court or out on the field.” Rivalries in sports tend to get nasty and build up real animosity between the participants. Luckily, both schools can focus on the pros of being rivals and get positive things out of it. The last few years have left a clear track record of the effects of this rivalry. 

To build a long-standing rivalry like the one that Lehman and Baruch have begun, the results of their games must be more than just for bragging rights. The track record shows that the competitiveness between both schools frequently includes a championship element, which has become a recurring feature of the rivalry. In collegiate sports, it’s a process to establish a system that consistently produces competitive teams.  One of the main factors is that after four seasons, athletes graduate and new student-athletes join the team. These newcomers must succeed players and assume the role of trying to emulate the same or higher performance levels. When speaking to Ryan about this, he explained what he thought was a key factor in dealing with this process: “Most teams are only successful as their recruiting is” he later added, “No coach at any time is done recruiting cause the minute you’re done for this year you're already starting for the next year.” The Apex and all its facilities constantly have their foot on the gas to grow and cultivate a winning culture across their various sports teams. The rivalry between Lehman and Baruch looks to deliver showcases of performance and looks to continue the trend this season.